Liberty Bell Bay provides hundreds of secure, well-paid jobs in a region where good jobs are hard to come by. More than 200 workers rely directly on this site, with many more jobs flowing through the local community. Despite market pressures from dumped overseas manganese products, this site is competitive by global standards. There is real interest from multiple buyers — but that only matters if the workforce stays and the plant keeps running. Our work here matters beyond this site. Manganese is a critical input into steel and other essential industries. Liberty Bell Bay supplies major Australian operations like BlueScope and Whyalla. If this site closes, those industries become more dependent on imports. This is also a future-facing industry. Bell Bay is powered largely by hydroelectricity, putting it in a strong position as Australia moves toward lower-emissions heavy industry. If the site closes, the cost won’t just be to workers — it will fall on taxpayers through termination liabilities and decommissioning costs. What happens now? The move into voluntary administration creates uncertainty — but also an opportunity to secure a future for this site. Liberty Bell Bay is a cornerstone employer in Northern Tasmania. Losing it would have serious consequences for workers, families, and the broader community. With targeted short-term government support, the site can be stabilised and sold to an owner committed to its long-term future. Workers, Tasmania and the country are better off if Bell Bay stays!

Housing costs are one of the biggest pressures facing working people. They affect where we can live, how far we have to commute, and whether we can get ahead. Union members are raising their voices to demand change because housing affordability won’t improve on its own. By coming together, workers can push for real reforms and make housing fairer. Sign the petition today if you agree the Federal Government must: 1. Create a fairer tax system for housing – reform negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions so home ownership is supported over investment for profit. 2. Invest in more public and affordable housing – commit to long-term, large-scale investment so more people can access secure homes.

We the undersigned, are writing to raise serious concerns about the combined impact of rising petrol prices, and inadequate award travel allowances payable to disability support workers. As you are no doubt aware, disability support workers are an essential workforce. Their work is inherently mobile. Workers are required to travel between multiple participants each day, often across significant distances, at all hours, and in locations where public transport is not a viable option. As a result, the vast majority rely on their own vehicles to deliver NDIS-funded supports. Sustained increases in petrol prices following the conflict in Iran have substantially increased the out-of-pocket costs borne by our members. However, neither the award travel allowance nor NDIS pricing arrangements adequately reflect this reality. The current award travel allowance only $0.99 per kilometre does account for sustained increases in petrol prices. As fuel costs rise, the real value of these allowances erodes further, effectively resulting in a reduction in workers’ take-home pay. At the same time, NDIS pricing settings do not provide a mechanism that meaningfully responds to sharp increases in fuel costs. While pricing models recognise labour and some operational costs, they do not adequately account for real-world travel expenses borne by workers. This situation is unsustainable. It is contributing to financial stress for workers, and ultimately undermines service continuity and choice for people with disability when workers are forced to consider working elsewhere due to increased out of pocket transport costs. In the immediate term, we urge the NDIA to work with Government, providers and unions to introduce an interim travel loading payable to disability support workers within NDIS pricing to respond to fuel price volatility. An interim loading would provide immediate relief while longer-term pricing and industrial issues can be addressed. Such a loading would be linked to recognised fuel price indicators to ensure it reflects real-world costs applied on a temporary basis while petrol prices remain elevated. Such an approach would be consistent with the way in which the sector sought to address financial implications on workers in the sector during the Covid-19 pandemic. Disability support workers perform skilled, complex and demanding work that is central to the success of the NDIS. They should not be expected to absorb escalating fuel costs simply to keep the Scheme functioning

DXC workers have gone 5 years without a pay rise, while inflation has risen by 24.5%.  After a long bargaining process and repeated below-inflation offers, workers have been forced to take protected industrial action for fair wages and conditions. DXC management can end this dispute at any time by bargaining fairly and coming to the table with an offer that recognises DXC employees' work, delivers a real cost-of-living wage increase, and protects existing workplace conditions. Sign this petition to tell DXC: stop lowballing workers and bargain fairly now. 

Coliban Water workers are the engineers, hydrologists, scientists and managers who keep safe, reliable water flowing to 180,000 people across the Bendigo and Castlemaine region. They’re delivering a $500 million infrastructure program to upgrade water and sewer systems that communities depend on every day. For five years, these regional professionals have watched their real wages go backwards while Coliban charges its customers the highest water prices in Victoria. Bills went up 4.5% last year alone, but the workers who keep the system running were offered just 2% annual increases. In real terms, that’s a pay cut of more than 10%. Now, instead of bargaining in good faith, this state-owned corporation is trying to bully workers out of exercising their legal right to take protected action. Threatening to stand workers down for setting an email auto-reply is not the behaviour of a responsible public employer. It’s union-busting, and it’s happening in the Premier’s own backyard.

We all deserve a good life – a roof over our head, food on the table, fuel in our cars, and the security of knowing our pay will cover the basics.   But for too many of us, that’s no longer the reality.  Instead of relief, we are being squeezed from every direction.  The Reserve Bank keeps raising interest rates, fuel prices are soaring, and big business is pocketing millions – while we are told to tighten our belts.  Workers didn’t cause the cost-of-living crisis – but we’re being asked to pay for it.  In the ASU’s Wages and Cost of Living Survey, almost 80% of workers surveyed have gone without meals because they couldn’t afford it. This is not ok.  Wages aren’t keeping up while corporate profits keep climbing.  When rent jumps, when groceries soar, when bills skyrocket – there’s only one solution that works: a real pay rise.  And pay rises don’t happen by accident. They happen when we come together and demand better. Pay rises start with us.  That’s why ASU members are campaigning for a 5% pay rise in this year’s Annual Wage Review – a rise that reflects the real cost of living and doesn’t leave workers behind.  The ASU is your voice for better pay - but the strongest voice is a united one. Join the campaign to win the wage increase you deserve. Become an Australian Services Union member today. 

Without the work Sustainability Victoria does, we won’t reach Net Zero. Abolishing Sustainability Victoria is a betrayal of the state government's own commitments to the community and climate. This is happening during a time when other key environmental agencies are being gutted, diminishing Victoria’s capacity to address biodiversity decline, waste reduction and climate action. To reach the Victorian Government’s target of Net Zero by 2045, Victoria needs to reduce emissions and waste– 36% of Victoria's emissions come from the extraction and use of manufactured goods and material products. A circular economy is integral to ensure the long-term repurposing, reusing and recycling of our resources. Why Should We Save It? • Sustainability Victoria is Independently Governed. For over 20 years, Sustainability Victoria has delivered the programs and expertise for Victoria to design out waste, under the guidance of an independent board and CEO. Without this independence, Victoria loses one of the only institutions that has a mandate to pursue sustainability outside of the electoral cycle. • Sustainability Victoria has its Own Funding Model. It is funded by the Municipal and Industrial Waste Levy (MILL), collected through council rates; by law, this levy must go to sustainability initiatives like waste reduction. If unspent, this fund sits idle, used by the government to prop up its budget bottom line. The fund, meant for agencies like Sustainability Victoria, is on track to have $700 million sitting idle by July 2026. • Sustainability Victoria benefits climate, community and the economy. By working with industry, schools, local governments and communities, SV provides evidence-based solutions that allow Victoria to reduce, reuse, and recycle. Modelling shows a circular economy, advanced by Sustainability Victoria’s team of experts, could increase Australia’s GDP by $26 billion in the next 10 years and add 150,000 new jobs to the Australian market by 2048. Sign our petition and send a clear message to the Government:  We cannot afford to go backwards. We cannot afford to lose Sustainability Victoria.

Local Government services in Victoria are in crisis because of chronic underfunding by the Allan Labor Government. Council workers across metropolitan Melbourne are under constant threat of outsourcing and have seen their real wages cut by between 7-12%. High rates of vacancies and turnover are endemic across the sector, and workers are more exposed than ever to occupational violence and unsustainable workloads.   This also means lower quality services for the broader community. It means understaffed libraries. It means graffiti being left up for weeks and subcontracted street sweepers racing through too many streets and leaving rubbish behind. It means youth workers preventing crime by providing vital early intervention services losing their jobs.   Our communities can’t afford a race to the bottom.

Our workplace laws need to catch up to the reality we're living and working in 2026. If you support changes to protect our work from the damaging new aspects of AI and workplace surveillance, think long service leave should follow you and not your boss, and want those who can to be able to work from home, sign this pledge.

The Victorian Catholic Education Authority (VCEA) is seeking to ignore the nearly 19,000 staff who signed a Statement of Support for fair bargaining last year – a clear majority of the 35,000 staff that the VCEA has claimed work in Victorian Catholic education. No good explanation has been provided for this anti-worker stance, and this continued denial of our basic rights is causing deep concern amongst staff in Catholic schools right across the state. As educators, we don’t want to have to take industrial action – but as workers, we know that the internationally-recognised right to do so is what gives us power at the bargaining table, and that without this right we are negotiating with one hand tied behind our back.  

A lot of Victorians in all sorts of industries can’t work from home - but our whole community wins when those who can work from home are given the option. It means fewer cars stuck in peak hour traffic and less congestion on public transport. Local small businesses benefiting from increased lunchtime demand. Families with someone around to pick up the kids up after school. That’s why I support moves by the Victorian Government to legislate a right to work from home for two days per week for people who are reasonably able to do so. I want all politicians, and all Victorians, to get behind this simple proposal that will improve the lives of millions of Victorians and their families.

When injured workers go through the WorkCover system, they can face disbelief, delays, intrusive surveillance, and adversarial processes when they are at their most vulnerable. Oftentimes, instead of being supported to recover and return to work safely, injured workers are forced to fight for treatment, income, and dignity. A meaningful Code of Injured Workers’ Rights would set clear, enforceable standards, ensuring workers are treated with fairness and respect, supported in recovery, and not retraumatised by the WorkCover system itself.